
Core i7-13700T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $315 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,611 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +58.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌82% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$384 MSRP
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Core i7-13700T
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $315 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +58.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,611 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌82% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$384 MSRP
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i7-13700T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 697 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 697 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 629 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 685 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 516 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i7-13700T
Core i7-13700T
The Core i7-13700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,890 points. Launch price was $384.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13700T versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 1.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700T scores 27,890 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 76.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,611 vs 38,581 (107.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,537 vs 2,926, a 14.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,020 vs 19,643 (26.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700T vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,890 | 62,323+123% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,611 | 38,581+232% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,537 | 2,926+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,020 | 19,643+31% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700T) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770,H710 (Core i7-13700T) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700T) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 770 (Core i7-13700T) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700T targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700T rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700T launched at $384 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($384 vs $699), the Core i7-13700T is $315 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700T delivers 72.6 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 20.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-45% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 72.6 | 89.2+23% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












