
Core i7-13700
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $315 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,230 vs 62,323).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌82% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$384 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700.
Core i7-13700
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $315 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (36,230 vs 62,323).
Trade-offs
- ❌82% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$384 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i7-13700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 906 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 851 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 735 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 660 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 799 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 542 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i7-13700
Core i7-13700
The Core i7-13700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 36,230 points. Launch price was $384.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700 versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700 scores 36,230 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 53% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.7 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 36,230 | 62,323+72% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700 launched at $384 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($384 vs $699), the Core i7-13700 is $315 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700 delivers 94.3 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Core i7-13700 the 5.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-45% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 94.3+6% | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












