
Core i5-13400E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $478 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.2 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,953 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 122.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Core i5-13400E
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $478 less on MSRP ($221 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 122.2 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($221 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,953 vs 38,581).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 122.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $221 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400E.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i5-13400E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 570 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 368 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 648 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 675 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400E and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i5-13400E
Core i5-13400E
The Core i5-13400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,000 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400E packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400E versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i5-13400E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400E scores 27,000 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 79.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,953 vs 38,581 (83% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,375 vs 2,926, a 20.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,977 vs 19,643 (65.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400E vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.7 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+540% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,000 | 62,323+131% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,953 | 38,581+142% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,375 | 2,926+23% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,977 | 19,643+97% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13400E) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B760,H770,Z790,H610,Q670 (Core i5-13400E) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13400E) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 730 (Core i5-13400E) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400E targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400E rivals Ryzen 5 7600; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13400E launched at $221 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($221 vs $699), the Core i5-13400E is $478 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13400E delivers 122.2 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Core i5-13400E the 31.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13400E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $221-68% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.2+37% | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












