
Core i5-11320H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11320H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,852 vs 38,581).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +90.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Core i5-11320H
2021Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +90.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1449 and DDR4.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,852 vs 38,581).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1449 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core i5-11320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i5-11320H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 244 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11320H and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i5-11320H
Core i5-11320H
The Core i5-11320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,879 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i5-11320H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-11320H versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i5-11320H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11320H scores 10,879 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 140.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 5,852 vs 38,581 (147.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,447 vs 2,926, a 67.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,633 vs 19,643 (110.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-11320H vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 32+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 10,879 | 62,323+473% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,852 | 38,581+559% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,447 | 2,926+102% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,633 | 19,643+249% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11320H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-11320H versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-11320H) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM570,QM580,WM590 (Core i5-11320H) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11320H) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) (Core i5-11320H) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11320H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-11320H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i5-11320H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











