
Core i3-10105F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-10105F
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $602 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 19,643).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +106.2% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i3-10105F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌620.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$97 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.
Core i3-10105F
2021Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $602 less on MSRP ($97 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +106.2% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i3-10105F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (4,503 vs 19,643).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌620.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$97 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10105F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i3-10105F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10105F and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i3-10105F
Core i3-10105F
The Core i3-10105F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 8,912 points. Launch price was $97.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i3-10105F packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i3-10105F versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 25.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i3-10105F uses the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10105F scores 8,912 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 150% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,461 vs 2,926, a 66.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,503 vs 19,643 (125.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 32+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.2 GHz+14% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-R (2021) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 8,912 | 62,323+599% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,461 | 2,926+100% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,503 | 19,643+336% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10105F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10105F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i3-10105F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-10105F) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i3-10105F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-10105F launched at $97 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($97 vs $699), the Core i3-10105F is $602 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10105F delivers 91.9 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Core i3-10105F the 3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10105F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $97-86% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 91.9+3% | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











