
EPYC 4565P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4565P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,031 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 280.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,343 vs 64,068).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4565P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 4565P
2025Ryzen 9 7950X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,031 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 280.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,343 vs 64,068).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4565P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4565P better than Ryzen 9 7950X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 687 FPS | 807 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 660 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 576 FPS | 668 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 732 FPS |
| medium | 707 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 624 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 718 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1106 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| medium | 991 FPS | 882 FPS |
| high | 867 FPS | 764 FPS |
| ultra | 781 FPS | 685 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 860 FPS | 814 FPS |
| medium | 759 FPS | 700 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 496 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4565P and Ryzen 9 7950X

EPYC 4565P
EPYC 4565P
The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.


Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X
The Ryzen 9 7950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-09-27. It is based on the Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,343 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 4565P and Ryzen 9 7950X share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X — identical boost frequencies (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X uses Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Ryzen 9 7950X's 62,343 — a 2.7% lead for the EPYC 4565P. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) |
| PassMark | 64,068+3% | 62,343 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 37,452 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,976 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,297 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM5 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X — the EPYC 4565P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4565P supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 7950X) — the EPYC 4565P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X).
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 128 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4565P) and Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) (Ryzen 9 7950X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen 9 7950X rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4565P launched at $2730 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X debuted at $699. On MSRP ($2730 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X is $2031 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X — making the Ryzen 9 7950X the 116.7% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730 | $699-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5 | 89.2+280% |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












