
Core i9-13900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 170W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (37,452 vs 40,998).
Core i9-13900KS
2023Ryzen 9 7950X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 170W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (37,452 vs 40,998).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900KS better than Ryzen 9 7950X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 790 FPS | 801 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 252 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 794 FPS | 732 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1089 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| medium | 975 FPS | 882 FPS |
| high | 853 FPS | 764 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 685 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 899 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 700 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 592 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X

Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS
The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X
The Ryzen 9 7950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-09-27. It is based on the Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,343 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900KS has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900KS uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X uses Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KS scores 60,543 against the Ryzen 9 7950X's 62,343 — a 2.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 40,998 vs 37,452 (9% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,123 vs 2,976, a 4.8% lead for the Core i9-13900KS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 21,421 vs 19,297 (10.4% advantage for the Core i9-13900KS). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+2% | 5.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) |
| PassMark | 60,543 | 62,343+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,998+9% | 37,452 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,123+5% | 2,976 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,421+11% | 19,297 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i9-13900KS supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 7950X) — the Ryzen 9 7950X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900KS) and Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) (Ryzen 9 7950X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen 9 7950X rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900KS launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X debuted at $699. On MSRP ($699 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KS delivers 86.6 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X — making the Ryzen 9 7950X the 2.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6 | 89.2+3% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












