
Core i9-13900KF
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,743 vs 57,803).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i9-13900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core i9-13900KF
2022Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Core i9-13900KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (57,743 vs 57,803).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7945HX3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7945HX3D better than Core i9-13900KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 658 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 432 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 573 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 355 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 211 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 628 FPS | 1077 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 1022 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 683 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 805 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 740 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 503 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1034 FPS | 1051 FPS |
| medium | 926 FPS | 951 FPS |
| high | 812 FPS | 833 FPS |
| ultra | 722 FPS | 745 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 831 FPS |
| medium | 757 FPS | 736 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 645 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 634 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 544 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 416 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900KF and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Core i9-13900KF
Core i9-13900KF
The Core i9-13900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,743 points. Launch price was $564.


Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-07-27. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,803 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KF packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900KF has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900KF versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KF (base: 3 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-13900KF uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KF scores 57,743 against the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D's 57,803 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KF vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+6% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+30% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 57,743 | 57,803 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 39,565 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,946 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,878 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KF versus 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900KF supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KF) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D) — the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900KF) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5200+103900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KF) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX3D). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Core i9-13900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900KF targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7945HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900KF launched at $599 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D debuted at $0. On MSRP ($599 vs $0), the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is $599 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KF | Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 96.4 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












