
Core i9-13905H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13905H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+11.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Ryzen 9 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i9-13905H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 19,384).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i9-13905H
2023Ryzen 9 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+11.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i9-13905H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 19,384).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Core i9-13905H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 422 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 745 FPS | 750 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 750 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 750 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 658 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Ryzen 9 7940HS

Core i9-13905H
Core i9-13905H
The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.


Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13905H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 17,443 (10.5% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,646, a 14% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,591 (18.8% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+4% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 29,807 | 29,986 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,384+11% | 17,443 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | 2,646+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000+21% | 11,591 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1792 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 20+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe 96EU (Core i9-13905H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | Thin-and-light Performance |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












