Core i9-13905H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS

Intel

Core i9-13905H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13905H

2023

Why buy it

  • +11.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7940HS.

Ryzen 9 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
  • 66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i9-13905H.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,443 vs 19,384).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7940HS better than Core i9-13905H?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7940HS is ahead with a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13905H pulls ahead with 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i9-13905H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13905H is the better fit. You are getting 11.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 7940HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13905H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low262 FPS267 FPS
medium253 FPS242 FPS
high210 FPS203 FPS
ultra180 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low223 FPS235 FPS
medium192 FPS193 FPS
high154 FPS157 FPS
ultra135 FPS139 FPS
4K
low154 FPS163 FPS
medium132 FPS136 FPS
high101 FPS105 FPS
ultra90 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low636 FPS497 FPS
medium543 FPS408 FPS
high458 FPS349 FPS
ultra417 FPS311 FPS
1440p
low554 FPS434 FPS
medium492 FPS376 FPS
high416 FPS322 FPS
ultra357 FPS274 FPS
4K
low325 FPS286 FPS
medium296 FPS259 FPS
high279 FPS243 FPS
ultra246 FPS209 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low648 FPS750 FPS
medium530 FPS750 FPS
high467 FPS730 FPS
ultra405 FPS624 FPS
1440p
low591 FPS750 FPS
medium491 FPS646 FPS
high427 FPS545 FPS
ultra370 FPS467 FPS
4K
low434 FPS544 FPS
medium374 FPS475 FPS
high339 FPS422 FPS
ultra290 FPS357 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
1080p
low745 FPS750 FPS
medium745 FPS750 FPS
high745 FPS750 FPS
ultra672 FPS750 FPS
1440p
low745 FPS750 FPS
medium723 FPS750 FPS
high626 FPS658 FPS
ultra552 FPS573 FPS
4K
low555 FPS574 FPS
medium504 FPS511 FPS
high451 FPS456 FPS
ultra394 FPS394 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Ryzen 9 7940HS

Intel

Core i9-13905H

The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13905H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Ryzen 9 7940HS's 29,986 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 17,443 (10.5% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,646, a 14% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,591 (18.8% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS.

FeatureCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+4%
5.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
4 GHz+54%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
29,807
29,986
Cinebench R23 Multi
19,384+11%
17,443
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
2,646+15%
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,000+21%
11,591
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — the Ryzen 9 7940HS offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS).

FeatureCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
Socket
FCBGA1792
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
256 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
12
20+67%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics Iris Xe 96EU (Core i9-13905H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H.

FeatureCore i9-13905HRyzen 9 7940HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe 96EU
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation
Thin-and-light Performance