
Ryzen 9 270
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 270
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 17,200).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 9 270
2025Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 17,200).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Ryzen 9 270?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 427 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 729 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 623 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 644 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 544 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 270 and Ryzen 9 7940H


Ryzen 9 270
Ryzen 9 270
The Ryzen 9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,602 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 9 270 and Ryzen 9 7940H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 270 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — identical boost frequencies (base: 4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 270 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 270 scores 29,602 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 270. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 17,200 (4.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,636 vs 2,646, a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,000 vs 13,495 (3.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 29,602+2% | 29,151 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | 17,200+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,636 | 2,646 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,000 | 13,495+4% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP8 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP8 platform (Ryzen 9 270) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V, SVM virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 270) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 270 targets Professional Content Creation Laptop, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 270 rivals Core i9-13900H; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 270 | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation Laptop | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












