
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 17,200).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,300 vs 17,200).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Ryzen 5 7600X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 9 7940H


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 7940H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 2.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 17,200 (11.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 2,646, a 9.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 13,495 (2.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+2% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+18% | 4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 28,325 | 29,151+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300 | 17,200+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900+10% | 2,646 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800+2% | 13,495 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Gaming | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












