
Core i9-7980XE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7980XE
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,999 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i9-7980XE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,151 vs 29,634).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Core i9-7980XE
2017Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +45.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 165W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i9-7980XE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,999 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌371.4% higher power demand at 165W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940H moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,151 vs 29,634).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940H better than Core i9-7980XE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 741 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 741 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 697 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 741 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 501 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 532 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7980XE and Ryzen 9 7940H

Core i9-7980XE
Core i9-7980XE
The Core i9-7980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,634 points. Launch price was $1,999.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7980XE packs 18 cores / 36 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7980XE has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7980XE versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-7980XE uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7980XE scores 29,634 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i9-7980XE. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total) on the Core i9-7980XE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36+125% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total)+55% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 29,634+2% | 29,151 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,646 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,495 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7980XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-7980XE versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940H — the Ryzen 9 7940H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-7980XE) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7940H). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-7980XE) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) — the Core i9-7980XE offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+120% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-7980XE) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). The Ryzen 9 7940H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i9-7980XE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-7980XE targets Workstation, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Workstation | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












