
Core i9-13905H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13905H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+12.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 19,384).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i9-13905H
2023Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+12.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 19,384).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13905H better than Ryzen 9 7940H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 745 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Ryzen 9 7940H

Core i9-13905H
Core i9-13905H
The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13905H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13905H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 2.2% lead for the Core i9-13905H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 17,200 (11.9% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,646, a 14% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 13,495 (3.7% advantage for the Core i9-13905H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+4% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 29,807+2% | 29,151 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,384+13% | 17,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | 2,646+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000+4% | 13,495 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 7940H) — the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1792 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 20+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe 96EU (Core i9-13905H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation, Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Workstation | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












