
Core i9-12900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7940H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900T
2022Why buy it
- ✅+32.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $489 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 22,809).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i9-12900T
2022Ryzen 9 7940H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+32.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $489 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (17,200 vs 22,809).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900T better than Ryzen 9 7940H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 615 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 544 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 552 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 371 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 344 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 666 FPS | 729 FPS |
| ultra | 591 FPS | 729 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 729 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900T and Ryzen 9 7940H

Core i9-12900T
Core i9-12900T
The Core i9-12900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 29,601 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7940H
Ryzen 9 7940H
The Ryzen 9 7940H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 29,151 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900T packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7940H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-12900T versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940H — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H (base: 1.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-12900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900T scores 29,601 against the Ryzen 9 7940H's 29,151 — a 1.5% lead for the Core i9-12900T. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 22,809 vs 17,200 (28% advantage for the Core i9-12900T). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,331 vs 2,646, a 12.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,116 vs 13,495 (10.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940H). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940H.
| Feature | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 4 GHz+186% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 29,601+2% | 29,151 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,809+33% | 17,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,331 | 2,646+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,116 | 13,495+11% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940H uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7940H supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900T) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 9 7940H).
| Feature | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940H has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900T) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 9 7940H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12900T) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 7940H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940H targets High-performance Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940H rivals Core i9-13900H.
| Feature | Core i9-12900T | Ryzen 9 7940H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | — | High-performance Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











