
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+26% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7900.
Ryzen 9 7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,600 vs 31,000).
- ❌4.9% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅+26% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 7900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,600 vs 31,000).
- ❌4.9% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7900 better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 101 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 226 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 876 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 699 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 702 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1125 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 987 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 860 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 765 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 7900

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900
The Ryzen 9 7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,168 points. Launch price was $429.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 7900's 48,168 — a 5.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7900. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 24,600 (23% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,800, a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 18,000 (5.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 48,168+5% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+26% | 24,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+2% | 2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+5% | 18,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7900) — the Ryzen 9 7900 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 7900).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7900 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon Graphics (Raphael) (Ryzen 9 7900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 9 7900 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics (Raphael) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7900 debuted at $429. On MSRP ($409 vs $429), the Core i7-13700K is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900 — making the Ryzen 9 7900 the 0.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-5% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9 | 112.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












