PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900F

2023

Why buy it

✅+51.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 93.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,600 vs 37,326).

Core i9-13900F

2023

Ryzen 9 7900

2023

Why buy it

✅+51.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅Delivers 20.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 93.4 PassMark/$ ($429 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 93.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (24,600 vs 37,326).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7900 better than Core i9-13900F?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 7900 is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900F pulls ahead with 51.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen 9 7900 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900F is the better fit. You are getting 51.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7900 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7900 is $95 cheaper on MSRP at $429 MSRP versus $524 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i9-13900F is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 51.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 20.2% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 93.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Core i9-13900F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7900 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13900F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
1080p
low	321 FPS	288 FPS
medium	311 FPS	259 FPS
high	247 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	209 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	270 FPS
medium	240 FPS	218 FPS
high	178 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	192 FPS	187 FPS
medium	164 FPS	151 FPS
high	123 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	101 FPS

Open Core i9-13900F Open Ryzen 9 7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
1080p
low	497 FPS	706 FPS
medium	434 FPS	599 FPS
high	354 FPS	450 FPS
ultra	313 FPS	389 FPS
1440p
low	422 FPS	593 FPS
medium	380 FPS	522 FPS
high	316 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	257 FPS	322 FPS
4K
low	236 FPS	335 FPS
medium	216 FPS	298 FPS
high	205 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	226 FPS

Open Core i9-13900F Open Ryzen 9 7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
1080p
low	762 FPS	876 FPS
medium	626 FPS	699 FPS
high	543 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	518 FPS
1440p
low	680 FPS	702 FPS
medium	567 FPS	562 FPS
high	485 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	423 FPS	408 FPS
4K
low	497 FPS	499 FPS
medium	430 FPS	414 FPS
high	383 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	312 FPS

Open Core i9-13900F Open Ryzen 9 7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
1080p
low	1012 FPS	1125 FPS
medium	905 FPS	987 FPS
high	792 FPS	860 FPS
ultra	704 FPS	765 FPS
1440p
low	840 FPS	892 FPS
medium	739 FPS	774 FPS
high	646 FPS	677 FPS
ultra	568 FPS	580 FPS
4K
low	620 FPS	644 FPS
medium	555 FPS	570 FPS
high	491 FPS	503 FPS
ultra	430 FPS	434 FPS

Open Core i9-13900F Open Ryzen 9 7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900F and Ryzen 9 7900

Core i9-13900F

The Core i9-13900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,934 points. Launch price was $524.

Ryzen 9 7900

The Ryzen 9 7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,168 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900F packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-13900F has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900F versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7900 — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900F (base: 2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900F scores 48,934 against the Ryzen 9 7900's 48,168 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i9-13900F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 37,326 vs 24,600 (41.1% advantage for the Core i9-13900F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,801 vs 2,800, a 0% lead for the Core i9-13900F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,199 vs 18,000 (4.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7900). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7900.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+2%	5.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.7 GHz+85%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	48,934+2%	48,168
Cinebench R23 Multi	37,326+52%	24,600
Geekbench 6 Single	2,801	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,199	18,000+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7900 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i9-13900F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7900) — the Ryzen 9 7900 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-13900F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 7900).

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900F) vs true (Ryzen 9 7900). The Ryzen 9 7900 includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (Raphael)), while the Core i9-13900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7900 rivals Core i9-13900.

Feature	Core i9-13900F	Ryzen 9 7900
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics (Raphael)
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-13900F launched at $524 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7900 debuted at $429. On MSRP ($524 vs $429), the Ryzen 9 7900 is $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900F delivers 93.4 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7900 — making the Ryzen 9 7900 the 18.4% better value option.