PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 44,940).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,280 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7845HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 7845HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +44.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7402P needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7402P.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Ryzen 9 7845HX

2023

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +44.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7402P needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike EPYC 7402P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 44,940).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,280 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7845HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7845HX better than EPYC 7402P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7402P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7845HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7845HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 44.7% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7845HX is the better fit. You are getting 2.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7845HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7402P makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 7845HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,280 MSRP, and it gives you a 44.7% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7402P is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7845HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7402P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7845HX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
1080p
low	183 FPS	285 FPS
medium	159 FPS	258 FPS
high	124 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	190 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	264 FPS
medium	128 FPS	215 FPS
high	97 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	183 FPS
medium	63 FPS	150 FPS
high	48 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	101 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 7845HX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
1080p
low	414 FPS	767 FPS
medium	369 FPS	636 FPS
high	303 FPS	479 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	413 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	644 FPS
medium	311 FPS	553 FPS
high	262 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	363 FPS
medium	195 FPS	316 FPS
high	165 FPS	280 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	239 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 7845HX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
1080p
low	588 FPS	896 FPS
medium	492 FPS	712 FPS
high	437 FPS	619 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	534 FPS
1440p
low	493 FPS	721 FPS
medium	419 FPS	574 FPS
high	374 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	519 FPS
medium	298 FPS	430 FPS
high	265 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	326 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 7845HX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
1080p
low	897 FPS	1124 FPS
medium	817 FPS	1006 FPS
high	705 FPS	873 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	770 FPS
1440p
low	709 FPS	902 FPS
medium	620 FPS	791 FPS
high	531 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	453 FPS	586 FPS
4K
low	502 FPS	649 FPS
medium	452 FPS	579 FPS
high	399 FPS	510 FPS
ultra	345 FPS	437 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 7845HX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 7845HX

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Ryzen 9 7845HX

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,940 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7845HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7845HX — a 43.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7845HX (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 7402P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7845HX uses Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the Ryzen 9 7845HX's 44,940 — a 2.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7845HX. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7845HX.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+100%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	5.2 GHz+55%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+100%	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	43,759	44,940+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	26,654
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,697
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,039

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7845HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7402P versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7845HX — the EPYC 7402P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7845HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) — the EPYC 7402P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 7845HX).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
Socket	SP3	FL1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	3200+63900%	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	64 GB+1638300%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7845HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7845HX). The Ryzen 9 7845HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7402P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7845HX targets High-end Gaming / Content Creation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248; Ryzen 9 7845HX rivals Core i9-13900HX.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 7845HX
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Radeon 610M
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	—	High-end Gaming / Content Creation