
Core i9-14900HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7845HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+31.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $668 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (26,654 vs 35,000).
Core i9-14900HX
2024Ryzen 9 7845HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+31.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7845HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $668 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7845HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (26,654 vs 35,000).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900HX better than Ryzen 9 7845HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 101 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 479 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 413 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 239 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 896 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 326 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 999 FPS | 1124 FPS |
| medium | 896 FPS | 1006 FPS |
| high | 783 FPS | 873 FPS |
| ultra | 696 FPS | 770 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 902 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 791 FPS |
| high | 639 FPS | 690 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 586 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900HX and Ryzen 9 7845HX

Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 9 7845HX
Ryzen 9 7845HX
The Ryzen 9 7845HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,940 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7845HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7845HX — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-14900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7845HX uses Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900HX scores 44,685 against the Ryzen 9 7845HX's 44,940 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7845HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 35,000 vs 26,654 (27.1% advantage for the Core i9-14900HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,697, a 10.6% lead for the Core i9-14900HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,500 vs 15,039 (15.1% advantage for the Core i9-14900HX). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7845HX.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+10% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 44,685 | 44,940 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,000+31% | 26,654 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+11% | 2,697 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500+16% | 15,039 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7845HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i9-14900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7845HX) — the Ryzen 9 7845HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 7845HX).
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7845HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7845HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900HX) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 7845HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 9 7845HX targets High-end Gaming / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen 9 7845HX rivals Core i9-13900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Flagship Gaming Laptop | High-end Gaming / Content Creation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












