
Ryzen 5 7600X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 6900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 15,300).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7600X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,445 vs 15,300).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7600X better than Ryzen 9 6900HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 524 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 436 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 571 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 571 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 9 6900HS


Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X
The Ryzen 5 7600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 28,325 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS
The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 7600X packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 6900HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7600X versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X (base: 4.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 7600X scores 28,325 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 20.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 15,300 vs 13,445 (12.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,900 vs 1,854, a 44% lead for the Ryzen 5 7600X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,800 vs 8,732 (45% advantage for the Ryzen 5 7600X). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7600X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+8% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.7 GHz+42% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-17% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 28,325+23% | 23,040 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,300+14% | 13,445 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900+56% | 1,854 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,800+58% | 8,732 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 7600X uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 7600X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 5 7600X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 6900HS) — the Ryzen 5 7600X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 5 7600X) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 6900HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 5 7600X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 5 7600X) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 6900HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 7600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 7600X rivals Intel Core i5-13600K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 7600X | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












