
Core i9-12900TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 6900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,887 vs 23,040).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-12900TE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i9-12900TE
2022Ryzen 9 6900HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-12900TE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,887 vs 23,040).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 6900HS better than Core i9-12900TE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900TE and Ryzen 9 6900HS

Core i9-12900TE
Core i9-12900TE
The Core i9-12900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,887 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 6900HS
Ryzen 9 6900HS
The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-12900TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900TE scores 22,887 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 6900HS. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS.
| Feature | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,887 | 23,040 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,445 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,854 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,732 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-12900TE) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS). The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-12900TE requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 6900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











