Core i9-12900TE vs Ryzen 9 6900HS

Intel

Core i9-12900TE

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 6900HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-12900TE

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,887 vs 23,040).
  • Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 6900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 6900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 6900HS

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-12900TE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 6900HS better than Core i9-12900TE?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-12900TE is ahead with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 6900HS pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Core i9-12900TE also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 6900HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 6900HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i9-12900TE makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 6900HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $494 MSRP, and it gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i9-12900TE is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i9-12900TE is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 6900HS is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low254 FPS251 FPS
medium239 FPS234 FPS
high201 FPS197 FPS
ultra172 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low220 FPS220 FPS
medium187 FPS186 FPS
high153 FPS152 FPS
ultra135 FPS133 FPS
4K
low151 FPS154 FPS
medium128 FPS131 FPS
high100 FPS101 FPS
ultra87 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low330 FPS441 FPS
medium281 FPS370 FPS
high235 FPS322 FPS
ultra211 FPS287 FPS
1440p
low273 FPS370 FPS
medium242 FPS323 FPS
high209 FPS288 FPS
ultra178 FPS247 FPS
4K
low169 FPS255 FPS
medium151 FPS229 FPS
high142 FPS215 FPS
ultra123 FPS186 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low572 FPS576 FPS
medium572 FPS564 FPS
high572 FPS485 FPS
ultra572 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low572 FPS576 FPS
medium572 FPS510 FPS
high572 FPS437 FPS
ultra572 FPS355 FPS
4K
low572 FPS432 FPS
medium495 FPS368 FPS
high440 FPS323 FPS
ultra370 FPS262 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
1080p
low572 FPS576 FPS
medium572 FPS576 FPS
high572 FPS576 FPS
ultra572 FPS576 FPS
1440p
low572 FPS576 FPS
medium572 FPS576 FPS
high572 FPS576 FPS
ultra572 FPS513 FPS
4K
low572 FPS536 FPS
medium572 FPS489 FPS
high511 FPS438 FPS
ultra433 FPS379 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900TE and Ryzen 9 6900HS

Intel

Core i9-12900TE

The Core i9-12900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,887 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 9 6900HS

The Ryzen 9 6900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,040 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-12900TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HS (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900TE scores 22,887 against the Ryzen 9 6900HS's 23,040 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 6900HS. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HS.

FeatureCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.3 GHz+200%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm
6 nm-40%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
22,887
23,040
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,445
Geekbench 6 Single
1,854
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,732
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 6900HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-12900TE) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 6900HS). The Ryzen 9 6900HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-12900TE requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 6900HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V