
Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,300).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 240 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,300).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 240 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HX better than Ryzen 5 240?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 520 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 240 and Ryzen 9 5980HX


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 5980HX
Ryzen 9 5980HX
The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 240 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5980HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HX. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+4% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+30% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,167 | 23,300 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 240) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












