EPYC 7F32 vs Ryzen 9 5980HX

AMD

EPYC 7F32

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HX

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,300).
  • Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 5980HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 7F32 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5980HX better than EPYC 7F32?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7F32 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5980HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5980HX is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 5980HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7F32 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 5980HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7F32 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5980HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low193 FPS260 FPS
medium158 FPS239 FPS
high136 FPS201 FPS
ultra100 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low167 FPS231 FPS
medium135 FPS192 FPS
high111 FPS156 FPS
ultra80 FPS136 FPS
4K
low69 FPS159 FPS
medium58 FPS134 FPS
high47 FPS103 FPS
ultra37 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low433 FPS427 FPS
medium379 FPS356 FPS
high309 FPS308 FPS
ultra259 FPS273 FPS
1440p
low367 FPS357 FPS
medium332 FPS312 FPS
high277 FPS276 FPS
ultra229 FPS236 FPS
4K
low236 FPS245 FPS
medium215 FPS220 FPS
high191 FPS207 FPS
ultra159 FPS180 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low581 FPS582 FPS
medium580 FPS582 FPS
high541 FPS576 FPS
ultra466 FPS472 FPS
1440p
low535 FPS582 FPS
medium437 FPS532 FPS
high401 FPS451 FPS
ultra342 FPS372 FPS
4K
low383 FPS456 FPS
medium300 FPS396 FPS
high268 FPS347 FPS
ultra213 FPS282 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low581 FPS582 FPS
medium581 FPS582 FPS
high581 FPS582 FPS
ultra581 FPS582 FPS
1440p
low581 FPS582 FPS
medium581 FPS582 FPS
high564 FPS554 FPS
ultra479 FPS475 FPS
4K
low519 FPS511 FPS
medium468 FPS460 FPS
high415 FPS405 FPS
ultra357 FPS348 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 5980HX

AMD

EPYC 7F32

The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HX

The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 5980HX share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HX.

FeatureEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+12%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 14 nm
7 nm
Architecture
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
23,253
23,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
Socket
SP3
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7F32) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 7F32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureEPYC 7F32Ryzen 9 5980HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (8CU)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End