
EPYC 7F32
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7F32
2020Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,300).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 7F32 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
EPYC 7F32
2020Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 7F32 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,300).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HX better than EPYC 7F32?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 437 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 401 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 564 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 5980HX

EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32
The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.


Ryzen 9 5980HX
Ryzen 9 5980HX
The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7F32 and Ryzen 9 5980HX share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7F32 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7F32 scores 23,253 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,253 | 23,300 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7F32 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7F32) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 7F32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | EPYC 7F32 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












