EPYC 7351 vs Ryzen 9 5980HX

AMD

EPYC 7351

16 Cores32 Thrd155 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HX

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7351

2017

Why buy it

  • +300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 23,300).
  • 244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 5980HX

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 7351 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5980HX better than EPYC 7351?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7351 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5980HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5980HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 16.4% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5980HX is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 5980HX still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 9 5980HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 5980HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low183 FPS260 FPS
medium160 FPS239 FPS
high128 FPS201 FPS
ultra102 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low151 FPS231 FPS
medium126 FPS192 FPS
high96 FPS156 FPS
ultra77 FPS136 FPS
4K
low70 FPS159 FPS
medium62 FPS134 FPS
high48 FPS103 FPS
ultra39 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low353 FPS427 FPS
medium321 FPS356 FPS
high271 FPS308 FPS
ultra219 FPS273 FPS
1440p
low305 FPS357 FPS
medium279 FPS312 FPS
high239 FPS276 FPS
ultra187 FPS236 FPS
4K
low190 FPS245 FPS
medium176 FPS220 FPS
high151 FPS207 FPS
ultra122 FPS180 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low581 FPS582 FPS
medium513 FPS582 FPS
high462 FPS576 FPS
ultra396 FPS472 FPS
1440p
low513 FPS582 FPS
medium428 FPS532 FPS
high376 FPS451 FPS
ultra323 FPS372 FPS
4K
low381 FPS456 FPS
medium305 FPS396 FPS
high269 FPS347 FPS
ultra219 FPS282 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
1080p
low581 FPS582 FPS
medium581 FPS582 FPS
high581 FPS582 FPS
ultra569 FPS582 FPS
1440p
low581 FPS582 FPS
medium581 FPS582 FPS
high504 FPS554 FPS
ultra425 FPS475 FPS
4K
low476 FPS511 FPS
medium430 FPS460 FPS
high378 FPS405 FPS
ultra323 FPS348 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 9 5980HX

AMD

EPYC 7351

The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5980HX

The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HX.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
4.8 GHz+66%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+300%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
23,226
23,300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
Socket
TR4
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-4266
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7351) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 7351 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.

FeatureEPYC 7351Ryzen 9 5980HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics (8CU)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mobile High-End