
EPYC 7351
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7351
2017Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 23,300).
- ❌244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 7351 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
EPYC 7351
2017Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while EPYC 7351 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 23,300).
- ❌244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HX better than EPYC 7351?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 513 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 9 5980HX

EPYC 7351
EPYC 7351
The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.


Ryzen 9 5980HX
Ryzen 9 5980HX
The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 49.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz+66% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+300% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,226 | 23,300 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7351) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the EPYC 7351 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












