
Core i5-13400
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13400
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Core i5-13400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,300 vs 23,769).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i5-13400
2023Ryzen 9 5980HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Core i5-13400 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $221 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,300 vs 23,769).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13400 better than Ryzen 9 5980HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 389 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 530 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 490 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 331 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 582 FPS |
| ultra | 594 FPS | 582 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 9 5980HX

Core i5-13400
Core i5-13400
The Core i5-13400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,769 points. Launch price was $221.


Ryzen 9 5980HX
Ryzen 9 5980HX
The Ryzen 9 5980HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,300 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13400 packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5980HX offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HX — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5980HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13400 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13400 scores 23,769 against the Ryzen 9 5980HX's 23,300 — a 2% lead for the Core i5-13400. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HX.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Cezanne-HX (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 23,769+2% | 23,300 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13400 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HX uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-13400) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HX). The Ryzen 9 5980HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Core i5-13400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HX targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Core i5-13400 | Ryzen 9 5980HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











