
Ryzen 5 230
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 230
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,257).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 230 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 230
2025Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics (8CU), while Ryzen 5 230 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,186 vs 20,257).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 5980HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 230 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Ryzen 5 230?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 272 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 435 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 348 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 505 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 230 and Ryzen 9 5980HS


Ryzen 5 230
Ryzen 5 230
The Ryzen 5 230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,186 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 230 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5980HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 5980HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 230 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 230 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 230 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 230 scores 20,186 against the Ryzen 9 5980HS's 20,257 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,186 | 20,257 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 230 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 230) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS). The Ryzen 9 5980HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (8CU)), while the Ryzen 5 230 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 230 | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











