
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5980HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 20,257).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 9 5980HS
2021Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5980HS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 20,257).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5980HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5980HS better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 464 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 348 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 9 5980HS

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 9 5980HS
Ryzen 9 5980HS
The Ryzen 9 5980HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,257 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 5980HS's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5980HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 9 5980HS's 20,257 — a 33.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5980HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5980HS.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 20,257+41% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5980HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5980HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon Graphics (8CU) (Ryzen 9 5980HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 5980HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 5980HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon Graphics (8CU) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











