
Core i9-14900
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $275 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.5 vs 56.8 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Ryzen 9 5950X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,321 vs 45,353).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5950X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 86.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900.
Core i9-14900
2024Ryzen 9 5950X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $275 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.5 vs 56.8 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 770, while Ryzen 9 5950X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,321 vs 45,353).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 86.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5950X better than Core i9-14900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 110 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 760 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 990 FPS | 997 FPS |
| medium | 886 FPS | 885 FPS |
| high | 774 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 688 FPS | 690 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 821 FPS | 828 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 631 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 554 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 419 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900 and Ryzen 9 5950X

Core i9-14900
Core i9-14900
The Core i9-14900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,321 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X
The Ryzen 9 5950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 45,353 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900 packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5950X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-14900 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5950X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900 scores 45,321 against the Ryzen 9 5950X's 45,353 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 5950X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5950X.
| Feature | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+14% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 45,321 | 45,353 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 36,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5950X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900 versus 3200 on the Ryzen 9 5950X — the Ryzen 9 5950X supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5950X) — the Ryzen 9 5950X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i9-14900) and AM4 (Ryzen 9 5950X).
| Feature | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5950X). The Core i9-14900 includes integrated graphics (UHD 770), while the Ryzen 9 5950X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900; Ryzen 9 5950X rivals Core i9-10900K.
| Feature | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Enthusiast | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900 launched at $524 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5950X debuted at $799. On MSRP ($524 vs $799), the Core i9-14900 is $275 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900 delivers 86.5 pts/$ vs 56.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5950X — making the Core i9-14900 the 41.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $524-34% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.5+52% | 56.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












