
Core i9-13900
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.4 vs 56.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 5950X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,252 vs 45,353).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5950X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 82.4 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-13900
2023Ryzen 9 5950X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.4 vs 56.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 5950X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,252 vs 45,353).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 82.4 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900 better than Ryzen 9 5950X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 313 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 236 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1010 FPS | 997 FPS |
| medium | 905 FPS | 885 FPS |
| high | 792 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 690 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 838 FPS | 828 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 554 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 609 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 419 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900 and Ryzen 9 5950X

Core i9-13900
Core i9-13900
The Core i9-13900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,252 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X
The Ryzen 9 5950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 45,353 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900 packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5950X — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-13900 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5950X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900 scores 45,252 against the Ryzen 9 5950X's 45,353 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5950X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5950X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+12% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 45,252 | 45,353 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5950X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900 versus 3200 on the Ryzen 9 5950X — the Core i9-13900 supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5950X) — the Ryzen 9 5950X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900) and AM4 (Ryzen 9 5950X).
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5950X). The Core i9-13900 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 5950X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 9 5950X rivals Core i9-10900K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900 launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5950X debuted at $799. On MSRP ($549 vs $799), the Core i9-13900 is $250 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900 delivers 82.4 pts/$ vs 56.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5950X — making the Core i9-13900 the 36.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-31% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.4+45% | 56.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












