PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900XT across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 44,105).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900XT

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +70.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $931 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
✅Delivers 269.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.4 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 7402P

2019

Ryzen 9 5900XT

2024

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +70.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $931 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
✅Delivers 269.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.4 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 180W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900XT across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 44,105).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌71.4% higher power demand at 180W vs 105W.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900XT better than EPYC 7402P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7402P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900XT is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900XT is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 70.5% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900XT is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900XT is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900XT is $931 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $1,280 MSRP, and it gives you a 70.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 269.7% better value on MSRP (126.4 vs 34.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900XT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7402P Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 5900XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
1080p
low	183 FPS	285 FPS
medium	159 FPS	260 FPS
high	124 FPS	214 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	181 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	261 FPS
medium	128 FPS	216 FPS
high	97 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	148 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	181 FPS
medium	63 FPS	150 FPS
high	48 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	102 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 5900XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
1080p
low	414 FPS	667 FPS
medium	369 FPS	573 FPS
high	303 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	339 FPS	538 FPS
medium	311 FPS	475 FPS
high	262 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	325 FPS
4K
low	209 FPS	316 FPS
medium	195 FPS	280 FPS
high	165 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	228 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 5900XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
1080p
low	588 FPS	839 FPS
medium	492 FPS	667 FPS
high	437 FPS	594 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	504 FPS
1440p
low	493 FPS	665 FPS
medium	419 FPS	527 FPS
high	374 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	386 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	474 FPS
medium	298 FPS	392 FPS
high	265 FPS	349 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	290 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 5900XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
1080p
low	895 FPS	1073 FPS
medium	817 FPS	972 FPS
high	705 FPS	850 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	766 FPS
1440p
low	708 FPS	846 FPS
medium	620 FPS	751 FPS
high	531 FPS	657 FPS
ultra	453 FPS	570 FPS
4K
low	501 FPS	622 FPS
medium	452 FPS	556 FPS
high	399 FPS	491 FPS
ultra	345 FPS	425 FPS

Open EPYC 7402P Open Ryzen 9 5900XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7402P and Ryzen 9 5900XT

EPYC 7402P

The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.

Ryzen 9 5900XT

The Ryzen 9 5900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 44,105 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7402P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7402P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900XT (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The EPYC 7402P uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402P scores 43,759 against the Ryzen 9 5900XT's 44,105 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900XT. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900XT.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
Cores / Threads	24 / 48+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.35 GHz	4.8 GHz+43%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.3 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+100%	64 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 14 nm	7 nm
Architecture	Zen 2 (2017−2020)	Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark	43,759	44,105
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	22,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,320
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	14,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7402P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7402P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — the EPYC 7402P supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7402P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900XT). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900XT) — the EPYC 7402P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7402P) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 5900XT).

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
Socket	SP3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	3200+79900%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096	128 GB+3276700%
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+433%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7402P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900XT). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900XT targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248.

Feature	EPYC 7402P	Ryzen 9 5900XT
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	—	High End Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7402P launched at $1280 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT debuted at $349. On MSRP ($1280 vs $349), the Ryzen 9 5900XT is $931 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402P delivers 34.2 pts/$ vs 126.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900XT — making the Ryzen 9 5900XT the 114.8% better value option.