
EPYC 7313
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7313
2021Why buy it
- ✅+26.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $534 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 26,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7313
2021Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+26.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $534 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 36.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 155W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌47.6% higher power demand at 155W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 26,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than EPYC 7313?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 518 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 504 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 385 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 372 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 903 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 628 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7313 and Ryzen 9 5900X

EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313
The EPYC 7313 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,938 points. Launch price was $1,083.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7313 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 7313 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 25.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 7313 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7313 scores 38,938 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 26,500 vs 21,000 (23.2% advantage for the EPYC 7313). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,736 vs 2,174, a 22.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,264 vs 11,888 (24.9% advantage for the EPYC 7313). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 38,938 | 38,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 26,500+26% | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,736 | 2,174+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,264+28% | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7313 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7313 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7313) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7313) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the EPYC 7313 offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Milan (EPYC 7313) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+3100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7313) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: EPYC 7313 targets Server / High-load computing, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7313 rivals Xeon Gold 6326; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Server / High-load computing | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7313 launched at $1083 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($1083 vs $549), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $534 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7313 delivers 36.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 65.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7313 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1083 | $549-49% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.0 | 71.0+97% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












