PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Why buy it

✅+18% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 24,775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Core i7-13700F

2023

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅+18% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Costs $190 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 106.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 24,775).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 106.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-13700F.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700F better than Ryzen 9 5900X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 9 5900X is ahead with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F pulls ahead with 18% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Ryzen 9 5900X also has the bigger cache pool with 113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700F is the better fit. You are getting 18% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700F is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700F is $190 cheaper on MSRP at $359 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it gives you 18% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 9 5900X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 16.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 50.0% better value on MSRP (106.4 vs 71.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 9 5900X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 12/24. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	264 FPS	323 FPS
medium	254 FPS	291 FPS
high	210 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	193 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	307 FPS
medium	193 FPS	248 FPS
high	153 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	193 FPS
medium	131 FPS	156 FPS
high	101 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	103 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	344 FPS	772 FPS
medium	293 FPS	647 FPS
high	247 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	450 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	619 FPS
medium	264 FPS	536 FPS
high	224 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	364 FPS
4K
low	177 FPS	365 FPS
medium	160 FPS	318 FPS
high	152 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	255 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	647 FPS	832 FPS
medium	530 FPS	645 FPS
high	467 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	459 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	721 FPS
medium	491 FPS	565 FPS
high	427 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	407 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	511 FPS
medium	373 FPS	421 FPS
high	338 FPS	374 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	308 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
1080p
low	936 FPS	974 FPS
medium	851 FPS	974 FPS
high	735 FPS	934 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	826 FPS
1440p
low	799 FPS	959 FPS
medium	712 FPS	843 FPS
high	615 FPS	726 FPS
ultra	542 FPS	617 FPS
4K
low	548 FPS	694 FPS
medium	497 FPS	621 FPS
high	444 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	388 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-13700F Open Ryzen 9 5900X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700F and Ryzen 9 5900X

Core i7-13700F

The Core i7-13700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,212 points. Launch price was $359.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13700F versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700F uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700F scores 38,212 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 1.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 24,775 vs 21,000 (16.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,676 vs 2,174, a 20.7% lead for the Core i7-13700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,254 vs 11,888 (18.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700F). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700F vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+8%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+76%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	38,212	38,955+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	24,775+18%	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,676+23%	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,254+20%	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-13700F versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Core i7-13700F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700F) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i7-13700F) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-13700F) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Core i7-13700F targets High-end Gaming, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Core i7-13700F	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	High-end Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700F launched at $359 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($359 vs $549), the Core i7-13700F is $190 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700F delivers 106.4 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Core i7-13700F the 40% better value option.