
EPYC 4344P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4344P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,821 vs 33,912).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4344P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
EPYC 4344P
2024Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.8 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,821 vs 33,912).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4344P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4344P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 102.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4344P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4344P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4344P better than Ryzen 9 5900?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 387 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 846 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 846 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 846 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 846 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 846 FPS | 690 FPS |
| medium | 846 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 788 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 846 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 846 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 846 FPS | 836 FPS |
| ultra | 846 FPS | 744 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 846 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 846 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 765 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4344P and Ryzen 9 5900

EPYC 4344P
EPYC 4344P
The EPYC 4344P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,821 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
The Ryzen 9 5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,912 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4344P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the EPYC 4344P versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900 — a 12% clock advantage for the EPYC 4344P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4344P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4344P scores 33,821 against the Ryzen 9 5900's 33,912 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4344P vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+13% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 33,821 | 33,912 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,960 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,896 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4344P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4344P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900 — the EPYC 4344P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4344P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4344P) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900) — the EPYC 4344P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4344P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4344P) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900). The EPYC 4344P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 5900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4344P targets Entry Server, Ryzen 9 5900 targets OEM Gaming. Direct competitor: EPYC 4344P rivals Xeon E-2468.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Entry Server | OEM Gaming |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 4344P launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900 debuted at $549. On MSRP ($329 vs $549), the EPYC 4344P is $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4344P delivers 102.8 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900 — making the EPYC 4344P the 49.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4344P | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-40% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.8+66% | 61.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












