
Core i9-14900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 51.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 3950X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,168 vs 38,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-14900T
2024Ryzen 9 3950X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 51.4 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 105W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 3950X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,168 vs 38,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 105W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3950X better than Core i9-14900T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 252 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 520 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 572 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 422 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 954 FPS | 963 FPS |
| medium | 877 FPS | 963 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 887 FPS |
| ultra | 682 FPS | 796 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 815 FPS | 881 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 678 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 597 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900T and Ryzen 9 3950X

Core i9-14900T
Core i9-14900T
The Core i9-14900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,168 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X
The Ryzen 9 3950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,519 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-14900T versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3950X — a 15.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-14900T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3950X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900T scores 38,168 against the Ryzen 9 3950X's 38,519 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 3950X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900T vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3950X.
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+17% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+218% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,168 | 38,519 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 3950X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3950X — the Core i9-14900T supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900T) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3950X) — the Ryzen 9 3950X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-14900T) and X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3950X).
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+139900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 128 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3950X). The Core i9-14900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 3950X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900T rivals Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900T launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 3950X debuted at $749. On MSRP ($549 vs $749), the Core i9-14900T is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900T delivers 69.5 pts/$ vs 51.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3950X — making the Core i9-14900T the 29.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-27% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.5+35% | 51.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












