
Core i5-14600
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 3900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14600
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $244 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.7 vs 65.2 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 3900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,319 vs 32,517).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900X.
Ryzen 9 3900X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i5-14600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.2 vs 126.7 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-14600 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-14600
2024Ryzen 9 3900X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $244 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 126.7 vs 65.2 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 3900X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Core i5-14600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,319 vs 32,517).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 3900X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 65.2 vs 126.7 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-14600 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3900X better than Core i5-14600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 654 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 447 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 467 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 258 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 794 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 647 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 707 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 808 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 808 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 813 FPS |
| ultra | 652 FPS | 813 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 788 FPS | 813 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 813 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 714 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 669 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 594 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14600 and Ryzen 9 3900X

Core i5-14600
Core i5-14600
The Core i5-14600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 32,319 points. Launch price was $255.


Ryzen 9 3900X
Ryzen 9 3900X
The Ryzen 9 3900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,517 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14600 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-14600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i5-14600 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900X — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-14600 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 3900X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600 scores 32,319 against the Ryzen 9 3900X's 32,517 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900X. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900X.
| Feature | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 32,319 | 32,517 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14600 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 3900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i5-14600 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900X — the Core i5-14600 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-14600 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-14600) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3900X) — the Ryzen 9 3900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14600) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900X). The Core i5-14600 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 3900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14600 targets Desktop, Ryzen 9 3900X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-14600 launched at $255 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 3900X debuted at $499. On MSRP ($255 vs $499), the Core i5-14600 is $244 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-14600 delivers 126.7 pts/$ vs 65.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 3900X — making the Core i5-14600 the 64.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-14600 | Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255-49% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 126.7+94% | 65.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











