
Core Ultra 9 185H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+15.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,332 vs 2,700).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 18,030).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 9 185H.
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+15.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,332 vs 2,700).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 18,030).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core Ultra 9 185H.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 185H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 587 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 661 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 634 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 543 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 534 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 734 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 701 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 609 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 185H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H
The Core Ultra 9 185H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,360 points. Launch price was $640.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 185H packs 16 cores / 22 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 185H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 185H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 185H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 185H scores 29,360 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,030 vs 15,930 (12.4% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,700 vs 2,332, a 14.6% lead for the Core Ultra 9 185H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,000 vs 11,037 (42.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 185H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 185H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 22+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 29,360 | 29,088 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,030+13% | 15,930 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,700+16% | 2,332 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,000+54% | 11,037 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 185H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 185H) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — the Core Ultra 9 185H offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 9 185H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 256 GB+167% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 185H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 185H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 185H targets Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 185H rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS; Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 185H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Mainstream Performance / AI Workloads | Enterprise Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











