
Core 9 270H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 9 270H
2024Why buy it
- ✅+3.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 16,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core 9 270H
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+3.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 16,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Core 9 270H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 643 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 719 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 513 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 720 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 720 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 636 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 642 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 9 270H and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Core 9 270H
Core 9 270H
The Core 9 270H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,793 points. Launch price was $697.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 9 270H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core 9 270H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core 9 270H versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Core 9 270H (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core 9 270H scores 28,793 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 15,930 (3.5% advantage for the Core 9 270H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,800 vs 2,332, a 18.2% lead for the Core 9 270H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 11,037 (23.7% advantage for the Core 9 270H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core 9 270H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| Feature | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+14% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 28,793 | 29,088+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500+4% | 15,930 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800+20% | 2,332 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000+27% | 11,037 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 9 270H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile platform (Core 9 270H) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).
| Feature | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 256 GB+167% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core 9 270H) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) (Core 9 270H) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 9 270H targets Extreme Gaming Laptop, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 9 270H rivals Ryzen 9 9900H; Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core 9 270H | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Xe Graphics (96 EUs) | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | Extreme Gaming Laptop | Enterprise Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












