
EPYC 4244P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4244P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 27,164).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
EPYC 4244P
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 27,164).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4244P better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 445 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 216 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4244P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P
The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 4244P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,164+1% | 26,852 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,244 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,602 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,244 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | — |
| Target Use | Entry Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












