EPYC 4244P vs Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

AMD

EPYC 4244P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 27,164).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
  • Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4244P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4244P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4244P is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4244P still looks like the safer overall buy. EPYC 4244P is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 8.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4244P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of FP7/FP8, 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low246 FPS269 FPS
medium228 FPS243 FPS
high197 FPS204 FPS
ultra171 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low217 FPS236 FPS
medium182 FPS193 FPS
high151 FPS157 FPS
ultra133 FPS139 FPS
4K
low151 FPS164 FPS
medium127 FPS136 FPS
high99 FPS105 FPS
ultra85 FPS92 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low525 FPS509 FPS
medium441 FPS419 FPS
high370 FPS361 FPS
ultra332 FPS322 FPS
1440p
low451 FPS445 FPS
medium392 FPS386 FPS
high333 FPS332 FPS
ultra288 FPS283 FPS
4K
low283 FPS293 FPS
medium251 FPS266 FPS
high234 FPS251 FPS
ultra203 FPS216 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS671 FPS
high679 FPS647 FPS
ultra679 FPS546 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS637 FPS
high679 FPS541 FPS
ultra621 FPS464 FPS
4K
low539 FPS541 FPS
medium471 FPS473 FPS
high411 FPS419 FPS
ultra341 FPS355 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS671 FPS
high679 FPS671 FPS
ultra679 FPS671 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS671 FPS
high679 FPS660 FPS
ultra645 FPS573 FPS
4K
low675 FPS572 FPS
medium594 FPS511 FPS
high526 FPS457 FPS
ultra437 FPS394 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4244P and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

AMD

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 4244P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

FeatureEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
8 MB+700%
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Raphael (2023−2025)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
27,164+1%
26,852
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,244
Geekbench 6 Single
2,602
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket
AM5
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.

FeatureEPYC 4244PRyzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use
Entry Server