PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900HK

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 27,217).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Core i9-13900HK moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-13900HK

2023

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP7/FP8 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,852 vs 27,217).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Older platform position on FP7/FP8, while Core i9-13900HK moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900HK better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is ahead with a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900HK pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Core i9-13900HK also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900HK is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900HK is the smarter buy today. Core i9-13900HK is at an unclear MSRP at $697 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900HK is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FP7/FP8, 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13900HK Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	262 FPS	269 FPS
medium	253 FPS	243 FPS
high	210 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	236 FPS
medium	192 FPS	193 FPS
high	154 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	164 FPS
medium	132 FPS	136 FPS
high	101 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i9-13900HK Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	636 FPS	510 FPS
medium	543 FPS	419 FPS
high	458 FPS	361 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	446 FPS
medium	492 FPS	386 FPS
high	416 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	283 FPS
4K
low	325 FPS	294 FPS
medium	296 FPS	266 FPS
high	279 FPS	251 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i9-13900HK Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	648 FPS	671 FPS
medium	530 FPS	671 FPS
high	467 FPS	647 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	671 FPS
medium	491 FPS	637 FPS
high	427 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	464 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	541 FPS
medium	374 FPS	473 FPS
high	339 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	355 FPS

Open Core i9-13900HK Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
1080p
low	680 FPS	671 FPS
medium	680 FPS	671 FPS
high	680 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	672 FPS	671 FPS
1440p
low	680 FPS	671 FPS
medium	680 FPS	671 FPS
high	626 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	555 FPS	572 FPS
medium	504 FPS	511 FPS
high	451 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	394 FPS

Open Core i9-13900HK Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HK and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Core i9-13900HK

The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 26,852 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS's 26,852 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i9-13900HK. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+6%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.8 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	8 MB+300%
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	27,217+1%	26,852
Geekbench 6 Single	2,629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Socket	FCBGA1744	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS). The Core i9-13900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS requires a dedicated GPU.