PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 9 285H

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (34,327 vs 34,827).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 9 285H.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core Ultra 9 285H

2025

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 9 285H.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (34,327 vs 34,827).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Core Ultra 9 285H?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is at an unclear MSRP at $400 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 14.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (87.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 9 285H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 9 285H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	300 FPS	248 FPS
medium	274 FPS	231 FPS
high	229 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	244 FPS	218 FPS
medium	199 FPS	183 FPS
high	161 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	140 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	169 FPS	152 FPS
medium	138 FPS	127 FPS
high	106 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core Ultra 9 285H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	749 FPS	616 FPS
medium	602 FPS	516 FPS
high	496 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	650 FPS	525 FPS
medium	544 FPS	461 FPS
high	449 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	331 FPS
4K
low	383 FPS	308 FPS
medium	328 FPS	276 FPS
high	303 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	260 FPS	228 FPS

Open Core Ultra 9 285H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	858 FPS	871 FPS
medium	826 FPS	871 FPS
high	717 FPS	871 FPS
ultra	611 FPS	871 FPS
1440p
low	858 FPS	871 FPS
medium	684 FPS	870 FPS
high	591 FPS	788 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	599 FPS	581 FPS
medium	497 FPS	499 FPS
high	449 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	380 FPS	379 FPS

Open Core Ultra 9 285H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	858 FPS	871 FPS
medium	858 FPS	871 FPS
high	839 FPS	871 FPS
ultra	742 FPS	847 FPS
1440p
low	858 FPS	871 FPS
medium	780 FPS	871 FPS
high	680 FPS	765 FPS
ultra	587 FPS	646 FPS
4K
low	594 FPS	680 FPS
medium	529 FPS	599 FPS
high	477 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	416 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core Ultra 9 285H Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285H and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Core Ultra 9 285H

The Core Ultra 9 285H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,327 points. Launch price was $651.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285H packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 9 285H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285H (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285H scores 34,327 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Cores / Threads	16 / 16+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+2%	5.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)+200%	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-40%	5 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-H (2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	34,327	34,827+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	26,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,720	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,330	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285H versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285H supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the Core Ultra 9 285H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 9 285H) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Socket	FCBGA2049	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR5x-8400, DDR5-6400	5200+103900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+157286300%	128
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+17%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 9 285H) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 9 285H) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 285H targets High-end Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 375; Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.

Feature	Core Ultra 9 285H	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel Arc 140T (8 Xe-cores)	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	High-end Mobile Workstation	—