
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 34,827).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 87.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 132.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌3.9% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $15 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 132.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 34,827).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 87.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌3.9% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 228 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 870 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 788 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 499 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 379 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 847 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 871 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 646 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 83% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 34,827+142% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5200+129900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, IOMMU |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($385 vs $400), the Core i7-9700K is $15 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 87.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 the 79.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-4% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 87.1+133% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











