PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 34,827).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +126.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +126.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 34,827).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
150% HIGHER MSRP
$400 MSRPvs$160 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 126.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 167.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 126.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the better fit. You are getting 167.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is 150.0% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 126.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.9% better value on MSRP (87.1 vs 81.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	192 FPS	248 FPS
medium	152 FPS	231 FPS
high	123 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	218 FPS
medium	119 FPS	183 FPS
high	97 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	152 FPS
medium	70 FPS	127 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	326 FPS	616 FPS
medium	318 FPS	516 FPS
high	290 FPS	427 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	386 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	525 FPS
medium	292 FPS	461 FPS
high	267 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	331 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	308 FPS
medium	258 FPS	276 FPS
high	235 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	228 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	326 FPS	871 FPS
medium	326 FPS	871 FPS
high	326 FPS	871 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	871 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	871 FPS
medium	326 FPS	870 FPS
high	326 FPS	788 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	581 FPS
medium	326 FPS	499 FPS
high	289 FPS	449 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	379 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
1080p
low	326 FPS	871 FPS
medium	326 FPS	871 FPS
high	326 FPS	871 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	847 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	871 FPS
medium	326 FPS	871 FPS
high	326 FPS	765 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	646 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	680 FPS
medium	326 FPS	599 FPS
high	326 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7745

The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,827 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — a 20.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745's 34,827 — a 91.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	5.3 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	13,029	34,827+167%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F versus 5200 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-10400F) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F) and AM5 (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745).

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Socket	LGA1200	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	5200+129900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+104857500%	128
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (Ryzen 7 PRO 7745). The Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 rivals Core i7-13700.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, IOMMU
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($160 vs $400), the Core i5-10400F is $240 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 87.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 the 6.7% better value option.