
Core Ultra 5 238V
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 238V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 130V, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $454 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,191 vs 18,219).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 238V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 238V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 238V
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2833 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics 130V, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 17W, a 2W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $454 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,191 vs 18,219).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 238V moves to FCBGA2833 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 238V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 238V better than Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 238V and Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

Core Ultra 5 238V
Core Ultra 5 238V
The Core Ultra 5 238V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,219 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,191 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 238V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 238V versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 238V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 238V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 238V scores 18,219 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U's 18,191 — a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 238V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 238V vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+4% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+5% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+400% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 18,219 | 18,191 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,683 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,130 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 238V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8533 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 238V) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U). The Core Ultra 5 238V includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics 130V), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 238V targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 238V rivals Ryzen 5 8640U.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 238V | Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics 130V | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











