
M4 (10 cores)
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M4 (10 cores)
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 4W instead of 45W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
2022Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while M4 (10 cores) needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (10 cores) across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (23,491 vs 23,784).
- β1025% higher power demand at 45W vs 4W.
M4 (10 cores)
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 4W instead of 45W, a 41W reduction.
Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while M4 (10 cores) needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (10 cores) across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (23,491 vs 23,784).
- β1025% higher power demand at 45W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 (10 cores) better than Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 440 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 508 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 577 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 511 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M4 (10 cores) and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
M4 (10 cores)
M4 (10 cores)
The M4 (10 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 7 May 2024 (1 year ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 23,784 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,491 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M4 (10 cores) packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the M4 (10 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the M4 (10 cores) versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H β a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is built on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (10 cores) scores 23,784 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H's 23,491 β a 1.2% lead for the M4 (10 cores).
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 2.89 GHz | 3.2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | β | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-50% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | β | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,784+1% | 23,491 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 13,149 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,649 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 7,431 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 (10 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (M4 (10 cores)) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H). The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the M4 (10 cores) requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | M4 (10 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











