
EPYC 7351
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7351
2017Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 23,491).
- ❌244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while EPYC 7351 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
EPYC 7351
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 155W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while EPYC 7351 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,226 vs 23,491).
- ❌244.4% higher power demand at 155W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H moves to FP7 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7351, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H better than EPYC 7351?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 513 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 581 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 581 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 504 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7351 and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H

EPYC 7351
EPYC 7351
The EPYC 7351 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,226 points. Launch price was $1,100.


Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,491 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7351 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7351 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the EPYC 7351 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H — a 47.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The EPYC 7351 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7351 scores 23,226 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H's 23,491 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7351 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 4.7 GHz+62% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+300% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,226 | 23,491+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,149 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,649 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,431 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7351 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 7351) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H). The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the EPYC 7351 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | EPYC 7351 | Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












