EPYC 7551 vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

AMD

EPYC 7551

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7551

2017

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (25,844 vs 26,054).
  • 176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while EPYC 7551 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than EPYC 7551?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7551 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 20.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 20.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (86.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 32/64. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low187 FPS159 FPS
medium165 FPS131 FPS
high132 FPS115 FPS
ultra105 FPS95 FPS
1440p
low153 FPS140 FPS
medium127 FPS113 FPS
high97 FPS95 FPS
ultra78 FPS79 FPS
4K
low71 FPS78 FPS
medium63 FPS68 FPS
high48 FPS55 FPS
ultra39 FPS44 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low207 FPS511 FPS
medium188 FPS431 FPS
high160 FPS336 FPS
ultra131 FPS295 FPS
1440p
low178 FPS431 FPS
medium163 FPS377 FPS
high141 FPS305 FPS
ultra111 FPS256 FPS
4K
low112 FPS267 FPS
medium103 FPS236 FPS
high92 FPS208 FPS
ultra75 FPS179 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low620 FPS649 FPS
medium518 FPS529 FPS
high466 FPS480 FPS
ultra399 FPS411 FPS
1440p
low517 FPS543 FPS
medium432 FPS449 FPS
high378 FPS409 FPS
ultra325 FPS350 FPS
4K
low383 FPS396 FPS
medium308 FPS320 FPS
high270 FPS289 FPS
ultra220 FPS227 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low646 FPS651 FPS
medium646 FPS651 FPS
high646 FPS651 FPS
ultra561 FPS641 FPS
1440p
low646 FPS651 FPS
medium584 FPS651 FPS
high500 FPS593 FPS
ultra420 FPS511 FPS
4K
low475 FPS526 FPS
medium427 FPS473 FPS
high375 FPS426 FPS
ultra320 FPS371 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

AMD

EPYC 7551

The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The EPYC 7551 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7551 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551 scores 25,844 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.

FeatureEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Cores / Threads
32 / 64+300%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3 GHz
4.6 GHz+53%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+100%
32 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Naples (2017−2018)
Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark
25,844
26,054
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7551 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 7551Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Socket
TR4
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0