
EPYC 7551
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7551
2017Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,844 vs 26,054).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while EPYC 7551 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7551
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,844 vs 26,054).
- ❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7551, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while EPYC 7551 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than EPYC 7551?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 399 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 320 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7551 and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551
The EPYC 7551 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,844 points. Launch price was $3,400.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7551 packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the EPYC 7551 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 7551 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 42.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 7551 uses the Naples (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7551 scores 25,844 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7551 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
| Feature | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+300% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+53% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Naples (2017−2018) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,844 | 26,054 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7551 uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | EPYC 7551 | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












