PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 26,054).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 132.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

2022

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.4% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 132.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 26,054).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 better than Core i7-9700K?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 21.4% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 81% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 21.4% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the better fit. You are getting 81% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is $85 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 21.4% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 132.2% better value on MSRP (86.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low	308 FPS	159 FPS
medium	278 FPS	131 FPS
high	231 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	140 FPS
medium	221 FPS	113 FPS
high	178 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	78 FPS
medium	140 FPS	68 FPS
high	108 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	44 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low	360 FPS	511 FPS
medium	321 FPS	431 FPS
high	291 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	431 FPS
medium	282 FPS	377 FPS
high	258 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	267 FPS
medium	221 FPS	236 FPS
high	208 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	179 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low	360 FPS	649 FPS
medium	360 FPS	529 FPS
high	360 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	411 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	543 FPS
medium	360 FPS	449 FPS
high	360 FPS	409 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	350 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	396 FPS
medium	360 FPS	320 FPS
high	360 FPS	289 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	227 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
1080p
low	360 FPS	651 FPS
medium	360 FPS	651 FPS
high	360 FPS	651 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	651 FPS
medium	360 FPS	651 FPS
high	360 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	511 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	526 FPS
medium	360 FPS	473 FPS
high	360 FPS	426 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	371 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 57.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+7%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Vermeer (2020−2025)
PassMark	14,397	26,054+81%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5845). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($385 vs $300), the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 86.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 the 79.6% better value option.