
M4 (8 cores)
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M4 (8 cores)
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (20,761 vs 20,870).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (8 cores) across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $220 MSRP, while M4 (8 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M4 (8 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
M4 (8 cores)
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (20,761 vs 20,870).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M4 (8 cores) across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $220 MSRP, while M4 (8 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M4 (8 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is M4 (8 cores) better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M4 (8 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M4 (8 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 181 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M4 (8 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M4 (8 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 480 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 429 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 333 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M4 (8 cores) and Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
M4 (8 cores)
M4 (8 cores)
The M4 (8 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 28 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.89 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x. Passmark benchmark score: 20,761 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,870 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The M4 (8 cores) packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the M4 (8 cores) versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE β a 14% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (base: 2.89 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is built on the Cezanne (2021β2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 (8 cores) scores 20,761 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE's 20,870 β a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE.
| Feature | M4 (8 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.89 GHz | 3.2 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | β | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | β | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | β | Cezanne (2021β2025) |
| PassMark | 20,761 | 20,870 |
Memory & Platform
The M4 (8 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M4 (8 cores) | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












