
Core Ultra 5 125H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 125H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,754 vs 20,870).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 125H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $220 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 125H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 125H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 5 125H
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,754 vs 20,870).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 125H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $220 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 125H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 125H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE better than Core Ultra 5 125H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 181 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 494 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 125H and Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE

Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H
The Core Ultra 5 125H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 14 cores and 18 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 18 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,754 points. Launch price was $375.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,870 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 125H packs 14 cores / 18 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 125H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 125H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 125H uses the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 125H scores 20,754 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE's 20,870 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 125H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 18+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-H (2023) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,754 | 20,870 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 125H uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 125H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2049 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












