
Core i9-7900X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7900X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 94.9 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $220 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $779 less on MSRP ($220 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 353.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.9 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($220 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,870 vs 20,907).
Core i9-7900X
2017Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $779 less on MSRP ($220 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 353.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.9 vs 20.9 PassMark/$ ($220 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 94.9 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $220 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,870 vs 20,907).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE better than Core i9-7900X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 181 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 429 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 523 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 523 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7900X and Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE

Core i9-7900X
Core i9-7900X
The Core i9-7900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 14 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,907 points. Launch price was $999.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,870 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-7900X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-7900X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-7900X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7900X scores 20,907 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE's 20,870 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i9-7900X. L3 cache: 14 MB (total) on the Core i9-7900X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE.
| Feature | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 14 MB (total) | 16 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 20,907 | 20,870 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,323 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,536 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7900X uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-7900X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE). Primary use case: Core i9-7900X targets High-End Desktop.
| Feature | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-7900X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE debuted at $220. On MSRP ($999 vs $220), the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE is $779 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7900X delivers 20.9 pts/$ vs 94.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE the 127.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7900X | Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $220-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.9 | 94.9+354% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











