PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 55.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $430 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 23,971).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($430 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Core i5-10400F

2020

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 46.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 55.7 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $430 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +58.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,029 vs 23,971).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.7 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($430 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G better than Core i5-10400F?

Yes. Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 58.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 84% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 58.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the better fit. You are getting 84% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is 168.8% more expensive on MSRP at $430 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it gives you a 58.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10400F is also 46.1% better value on MSRP (81.4 vs 55.7 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i5-10400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-10400F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
1080p
low	192 FPS	222 FPS
medium	152 FPS	188 FPS
high	123 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	112 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	189 FPS
medium	119 FPS	155 FPS
high	97 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	90 FPS
medium	70 FPS	79 FPS
high	55 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	49 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
1080p
low	326 FPS	481 FPS
medium	318 FPS	398 FPS
high	290 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	415 FPS
medium	292 FPS	359 FPS
high	267 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	309 FPS	286 FPS
medium	258 FPS	254 FPS
high	235 FPS	237 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	204 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
1080p
low	326 FPS	599 FPS
medium	326 FPS	589 FPS
high	326 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	436 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	526 FPS
medium	326 FPS	449 FPS
high	326 FPS	402 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	331 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	383 FPS
medium	326 FPS	322 FPS
high	289 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	223 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
1080p
low	326 FPS	599 FPS
medium	326 FPS	599 FPS
high	326 FPS	599 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	599 FPS
1440p
low	326 FPS	599 FPS
medium	326 FPS	599 FPS
high	326 FPS	599 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	522 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	552 FPS
medium	326 FPS	497 FPS
high	326 FPS	439 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	380 FPS

Open Core i5-10400F Open Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne PRO (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 23,971 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10400F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G uses Cezanne PRO (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10400F scores 13,029 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G's 23,971 — a 59.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz	4.6 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.8 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Cezanne PRO (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark	13,029	23,971+84%
Cinebench R23 Multi	8,191	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,454	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,783	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10400F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Socket	LGA1200	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Core i5-10400F	Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-10400F launched at $160 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G debuted at $430. On MSRP ($160 vs $430), the Core i5-10400F is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10400F delivers 81.4 pts/$ vs 55.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G — making the Core i5-10400F the 37.4% better value option.